katallison: (Default)
katallison ([personal profile] katallison) wrote2005-06-12 05:20 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

So I posted something earlier today about getting back into writing, and in a comment, [livejournal.com profile] cesperanza pointed out that I'm really a "Method" writer, one who (like a Method actor) spends a lot of time upfront thinking through characters' emotions and motivations, and then has to struggle to figure out what the characters should do to express those; whereas she writes in what she calls the "British" method, analogous to the great British actors who stand *here* and say the line and then walk over *there* and do that piece of business, and work back from there to discern and build in the emotional underpinnings.

And now I'm fascinated by this, because I just assumed that everyone goes about writing in the same way I do, more or less, and I'm having fun trying to get my head around what it would be like to simply have some scenes in mind, and write them out, without having already done a lot of sort of preparatory emotional outlining to guide the process. And because I have a ton of other stuff I should be doing, I thought that instead I'd -- that's right, do a poll!

[Poll #511623]
ext_3579: I'm still not watching supernatural. (Plump fiction (c) Henson Entertainment)

Whackjobs Unite!!

[identity profile] the-star-fish.livejournal.com 2005-06-12 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
::raises hand in ... some kind of gesture which is meant to show whackjob solidarity without being threatening in any way::

Yeah, I almost always start a story by hearing a line of dialog (or very occasionally narrative) in my head. My long hiatus was due to not hearing "the voices" anymore (and lo, I was sad).

Re: Whackjobs Unite!!

[identity profile] laurashapiro.livejournal.com 2005-06-13 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
Hee. Non-threatening solidarity sounds good.