ext_7027 ([identity profile] katallison.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] katallison 2005-02-17 01:31 am (UTC)

See, I think part of the problem is they're trying to have it both ways. If House was to medicine what, say, Action was to Hollywood--a cool-eyed exploration of the essential exploitative heartlessness of a privileged order--that would be one thing. But (and I respect this) they can't quite jettison the fact that the patients are people, in real pain, and so House's essential cold-heartedness comes across (to me, at least) as a jarring thing. I mean, I really do respect the effort and intent here, but they really have painted themselves into a corner, and they can't take either of the obvious routes out of it.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting