katallison (
katallison) wrote2004-11-04 02:56 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(no subject)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I find this fascinating, especially as a countermeasure to the generalizations about the South and Midwest that have been flying around the past couple of days. Consider, for example, that very blueish-toned band of counties meandering from Louisiana through Alabama and Mississippi and into South Carolina. Or those blue spots in the upper Great Plains--I can't even identify what, if any, cities those would map onto. (Since state boundaries aren't shown, one thing this map also reveals to me is my less-than-perfect grasp of geography. *g*)
I should locate a good color printer and run myself a copy of this, to tack up over my desk. Nothing about this country is as simple as I am sometimes, in my bitter moments, tempted to believe.
no subject
no subject
And perhaps that should go double for us, the non-Americans, with our bad habit of mentally homogenising America... to the point where we overlook, as
no subject
no subject
no subject
~
no subject
Blue in the Upper Great Plains
I had the same question when I saw that map last year, and I did some research on a few of those bright plue patches. Most of them show nothing there on maps of their respective states -- half the county is federally protected wild area, and the other half doesn't even show a town, let alone a largely democratic city. So who's voting, I wondered? National Park Rangers? And why isn't there even the slightest tinge of purple?
It turns out that every blue patch I looked at is a reservation. Native American tribes who are really, really pissed with Bush.