OK, show of hands, everyone who's been vegging out for the holiday and who was consequently unaware of a major new Windows security hole? ::raises hand::
This is the Windows metafile exploit, as described in a good quick overview and FAQ from SANS. Secunia has rated it as "extremely critical." Looks like it has the potential to be very nasty indeed; I've both installed the unofficial patch and temporarily unregistered the affected .dll, but I'm also going to scale back my web browsing until this thing is resolved.
[Insert obligatory rantage directed Microsoft-wards, and yes, all you Mac and Linux users, I can hear you snickering...]
This is the Windows metafile exploit, as described in a good quick overview and FAQ from SANS. Secunia has rated it as "extremely critical." Looks like it has the potential to be very nasty indeed; I've both installed the unofficial patch and temporarily unregistered the affected .dll, but I'm also going to scale back my web browsing until this thing is resolved.
[Insert obligatory rantage directed Microsoft-wards, and yes, all you Mac and Linux users, I can hear you snickering...]
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-02 03:37 pm (UTC)More like WTF files.
God. I know I sound like the biggest Luddite, but...
*whimpers*
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-02 03:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-02 06:21 pm (UTC)I followed a link to the Microsoft explanation and it was a little easier to understand. Of course, they don't make it sound as dire (and I don't trust them for a second). According to their FAQ, *if* I'm reading it right, if you're up to date on McAfee or Symantic or several other anti-virus softwares, you're protected. At this point, I'm going to have to believe that, since installing an unofficial patch or getting into the registry would be, with my computer "skills", almost certainly fatal to my computer.
Thanks Kat -- I hadn't even heard of this.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 04:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 04:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 12:33 pm (UTC)Me, I've started using Firefox with images disabled -- not that it's entirely clear that that'll help. (It does make websurfing a strange and curious experience, through.)
In any event, I'm really sorry that happened to you. Best wishes for quick recovery of your computer!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-02 03:46 pm (UTC)But then I haven't used a Windows computer for longer than five minutes since back when the years still started with 19.. so I guess it could be basic without me knowing. It's not that I switched to Linux out of any deep ideological reasons, Mainly I just can't afford to buy Windows software, and as a secondary reason I also was fed up that the problems with Windows always seemed so irrational and you never could do anything to fix stuff, whereas with Linux mostly I encounter annoying stuff that I can resolve in at least a somewhat workable fashion with patience (admittedly lots and lots of patience sometimes *g*) and a bunch of how-to files.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-02 03:58 pm (UTC)Kat, I am totally not snickering! I really wish the most popular OS in the world wasn't also the least secure. :(
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-02 04:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-02 06:20 pm (UTC)Rotsa ruv and a happy new year, Kat.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-02 07:21 pm (UTC)|
|
Points at icon
::tries not to snicker::
(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-02 08:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-01-03 01:12 am (UTC)