Hmm.

Aug. 21st, 2003 02:03 pm
katallison: (Default)
[personal profile] katallison
OK, I'm still trying to write a Vividcon con report, with marked lack of success, but in the meantime -- I'm very curious about something I've come across a couple of times lately in LJ comments, and that is the issue of the name you use to refer to a character when you're writing a close-3rd-person-POV story about that character.

Ahem. Let me see if I can be clearer. Say I'm writing a story in 3rd person about Fraser, where he's the POV character. I always refer to him as "Fraser" because that's, y'know, what I call the guy. But I've seen a couple of people lately saying that in such situations the name used should be the one that the character himself uses when he thinks about himself, so the question is does he think of himself as Fraser, or Ben, or Benton, or whatever?

See, in my head this is kind of, sort of, related to the issue [livejournal.com profile] flambeau was talking about a while ago (here, to be specific), where you can't sneak in descriptive stuff by having the POV character musing about his own tautly muscled abs or emerald eyes or whatever, or on the other hand providing detailed descriptions of scenes he regularly moves through and is familiar with to the point of obliviousness. You have to maintain the authenticity/integrity of the character's own awareness. And one could argue, I guess, that using the name the character would use about himself inwardly is part of that authenticity-maintenance, except -- I dunno, I just have never thought of it that way. It feels strange to me, and I'd love to hear others' views.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-08-21 04:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] merryish.livejournal.com
Hey, I resent the implication that you can't say what you mean and be funny at the same time! That's my lifestyle, there! =)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-08-21 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] suzecarol.livejournal.com
In other words -- just because it ended in a joke, it doesn't mean the voting suggestion wasn't meant seriously. Granted, that's possible, but ... in order to be serious about that, I'd have to be a complete moron.

Granted, fandom always seems to have more than enough morons to go around, but...

How deep shall we dig this pit? *g*

Pondering...

Date: 2003-08-21 04:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] suzecarol.livejournal.com
What does a complete moron have that an incomplete moron doesn't?

Accessories?

(no subject)

Date: 2003-08-21 04:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] merryish.livejournal.com
I say we take it outside. Grr!

( <-- note special kerfluffle icon! )

(also kidding. =)

Poor baby!

Date: 2003-08-21 05:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] suzecarol.livejournal.com
(also kidding. =)

Hey, I got that! Go, me! :-)

Profile

katallison: (Default)
katallison

November 2009

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags